Archive for the ‘Business Practices’ Category

The Halcyon Days of Analytics

Wednesday, June 18th, 2008

Elite service companies are tapping their growing pools of data to make better decisions.  Market leading  businesses focus on collecting the right information and interpreting it for improving their internal process and for engaging their customers. Leveraging the emerging discipline of analytics, or expertly managing and interpreting business information, gives companies a decisive edge.

It seems axiomatic. The more a company knows about the people it wants to serve, the better able it is to create offerings they prefer, to develop targeted messages, and to extract more value across the customer experience.

This Spring, my company launched Value-based Analytics, a model for measuring what your most valuable  customers need and want (“value drivers”), and the ways that client’s services meet and don’t meet those drivers.

Many companies are adrift in a sea of numbers. But for those with a clear understanding of how quality business intelligence can be used to make sound decisions, these really are the halcyon days of analytics.

It is increasingly feasible for enterprises to tap information to handle more granular segmentation, low-cost experimentation, and customization. Data mining and speech analytics tools are increasingly affordable and are leveling the playing field, even for mid-range players.  The quality and availability of information are  both rising while the costs of managing information are falling.

Many service firms that collect information obsessively are paralyzed by the reams of data. Choosing the right information to extract and interpreting it accurately require focus and fine-tuning.  Like any other enterprise capability, analytics ought to be tied to business strategy.

Before jumping into the deep end of the pool, there’s a caveat. Building analytical capabilities across the enterprise often challenges the orthodoxy. Shifting to a more analytical approach upends legacy systems and undermines the status quo. Information is power and, naturally, some managers see a full-scale analytics initiative as threatening.

Transforming the company’s analytical capabilities is always an exercise in change management.   Firms that rely on expert analytics – tools and mindset — to make better decisions stand to gain a valuable competitive advantage at a time that such advantages are increasingly harder to come by.

Want more info on this subject?  Here are two exceptional resources:

Thomas H. Davenport and Jeanne G. Harris, Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2007.

Stefan H. Thomke, Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.

Asking “What’s Next?”. Obsessively

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

I think what sets our company apart is our obsessive inquiry into what works today and what will work tomorrow.  Asking what’s next inspires more creative thinking, while broadening the conversation.  This dialectic prompts even more questions: How can companies across industries and continents succeed in an ever-flattening world where competitors are hungrier and customers more demanding?

How does a telecom firm in Ontario inspire new ways to extract value for companies in Doha and Johannesburg? How does an airline in Singapore show a high-speed rail company in France how to deliver a more seamless customer experience?  How does a leading British hotel chain show a new comer in Dubai how to anticipate customer needs?

More broadly, how can what works in one market be transferred to another?  What works in mature markets and in emerging ones, and in all markets?  What works today, and how can it be adapted in tomorrow’s market?

What has worked and probably what will work ahead? It’s not more bells and whistles or silver bullets, but a clear, customer-driven focus—new, creative ways of mobilizing talent and allocating resources to fulfill the brand promise consistently, reliably and efficiently.

About the ’creative’ part.  It’s essential, but so elusive.  Our experience shows that the most creative leaders “see” — patterns and trends — that others don’t. Innovative leaders design their service models to take advantage of them . By recognizing drivers that others don’t, true innovators overcome constraints that their rivals consider to be immutable.

However, leaders typically struggle to explain how they did it, and they often attribute it to good fortune. We’re convinced that game-changing results can be generated repeatedly.  But doing so requires challenging the tendency for habitual thinking.

So, what also sets us apart, I think, is our incessant curiosity. We’re looking for ways to foster collaborative intelligence and build communities of knowledge and practice.

We’re always on the hunt for novel tools and practices that can create substantial value. And we experiement, harnessing the best, most practical ones.  We do all of this, of course, while obsessively probing the ultimate questions: What’s next, and who will figure it out?

On “New Age of Innovation”

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

Management guru C.K. Prahalad has an amazing knack for zeroing in on what’s salient.  Among his other big ideas, he’s introduced business practitioners to the importance of delivering services to emerging markets. In his latest book, The New Age Of  Innovation, with co-author, M.S. Krishnan, he advances the need for a new paradigm in business.

The duo discusses their book in the New Age of Innovation blog where Prahalad asserts that our industrial system has reached an inflecton point.

He writes,

“Ubiquitous connectivity (e.g. cell phones and PCs), digitization, convergence of technology and industry boundaries (e.g. consumer electronics, computing, communications), and the emergence of social networks have collectively put a turbo charge on this transformation. This transformation is affecting all industries.”

The transformation, he argues, is changing the way firms create value and, therefore, the way we all work.

He poses the following questions:

a. How are these trends playing out in your industry? Obvious impact (e.g. advertising, music industry) or subtle but significant (e.g. insurance) or weak signals for now but accelerating (e.g. shoes)?

b. Is there an emerging consensus among your colleagues on how it will transform the way you work? The way you approach your customers?

c. How will it impact the work of CIO/CTO/HR professionals? How well prepared are you for the changes needed in the basic approach to the function and the new skills needed (e.g. global project teams, flexible and resilient business processes)?

d. Will the nature of relationships between the CEO, business unit managers, and CIO/HR change? Should it?

e. Do your colleagues see IT as strategic or do they still persist in believing IT does not matter?

This transformation in business is dramatically changing the way firms will create value. How shall we adapt our business models to operate successfully in the new paradigm?

Good questions.

EM learning model

Tuesday, March 11th, 2008

We’re developing, in successive approximations, a hybrid model of delivering premium training to emerging companies—those emerging regions that are clamoring for competitive capabilities to succeed in a world with more competitors along with more demanding customers.

It features, among other things, ”modular” content design which enables us to reduce development cycles and labor without compromising content quality.  A new quick-check knowledge management system is powering this effort.

Today, many organizations offer innovative solutions for improving knowledge transfer, as well as products that enhance the learner experience. But, we want to go further by translating our vision for delivering premium learning services to emerging markets where we can achieve superior learning outcomes at significantly reduced costs.

We aim to further our mission of creating substantial business impact through initiatives designed to provide research-based solutions, expertise and structured peer interaction.

And, of course, we must do all this without compromising quality.  Not easy, but worth the effort to be sure.

Creative problem-solving

Tuesday, February 26th, 2008

The sweet spot in business consulting is showing clients something they’ve never seen before.  That was the concensus of our consulting team’s work last week at our mid-quarter summit as we reflected on our problem-solving techniques.  It was our second foray reflecting on how we solve problems, and we agreed we’ll do it again later this year.

We concluded that we’re most successful in discovering fresh insights about an intractable problem, when we step way back to see the problem from a different perspective.  We strive to intentionally shift our point-of-view in order to see the problem in a new light. We turn the problem on its side, and upside down, and inside out, etc., and we don’t stop, until an epiphany occurs—a moment of clarity in which we discover a whole new way of seeing it.  In short, we assume a different relationship to the problem.

By shifting our cognitive framework, a creative solution almost invariably emerges.  In fact, it’s been there all along — as Aldous Huxley observed –it’s just been indiscernable.  Hidden in the weeds because our cognitive biases keep us from from seeing it.

When figuring out how to solve a customer’s problem, the tendency is to come up with a concrete, linear solution that eliminates or “works around” the root cause of the problem.   Ironically, some of the best solutions arise from a non-linear approach.  For instance, a major breakthrough in computer printing technology was made possible by creating a new language (called “Postscript”) for communicating from a computer to a printer. We came up with several illustrative examples of break-through solutions like this.

The key to creative problem-solving is to get outside of our conventional “framing,” and see it in a different context.  Change the composition of the problem, or the lighting. Walk away from it.

Seeing the problem differently requires first checking one’s judging mind at the door to the extent possible.  Don’t worry. You can always re-assert your cognitive framework and linear, analytical mindset when you get done or, better yet, revise it.

Last week’s conversation about applying creativity to problem solving was very insightful.  We left convinced that we can improve our capacity for creative problem-solving by tackling many different kinds of problems – gardening, oil painting, learning a language, teaching a child, eradicating malaria — in addition to solving the kinds of problems we get paid to solve…

High Performing Teams

Saturday, February 23rd, 2008

Over the 18 months, we’ve had our share of success working with clients’ high performing business teams.  One team at a U.S. telecommunications company was so successful in improving the organization’s customer service that the ad hoc unit was commissioned by senior management to operate as a permanent fixture—a dedicated service quality team.

The unit’s mission is to continually improve service levels at their contact centers while minimizing operating costs.  In a relentless pursuit of their goals, they’ve left no rock unturned. And, as the team matures, they seem to be out-doing themselves by every measure.  Team members are competing with each other while working as a cohesive unit. They somehow manage the complexities of group dynamics, including decision making, power, and conflict. It’s a thing of beauty.

I have to ask, why do high performance teams succeed where other change interventions fail?  What attributes do successful change teams share, and what can we learn from teams that can be applied to other organizational situations?  Can the attributes that successful ad hoc teams share be transferred to routine operating units?  These are questions that my colleagues and I are going to be taking up.

In the meantime, here’s what we see. High performing teams demonstrate a substantial capacity to drive an organization beyond its traditional boundaries. They stimulate creativity making the organization more adaptive to market forces, while tapping its intellectual reserves.

High performing teams reflect the company’s mission and values through “distributed leadership” at every level — individuals who transmit consistent messages about the company’s vision and direction for realizing change.

High performing teams possess a clear purpose, and communicate that effectively throughout the broader organization. Team members trust and respect one another. And they aren’t afraid to engage in conflict to identify insights that can be applied to advancing the initiative. Once they commit to a decision, they assume a common of action.

The most effective teams see the big picture. The members see the challenge in the context of the team’s work including the relevance of his or her job and how it impacts the effectiveness of the others and the overall team effort. Seeing the big picture promotes greater collaboration, increases commitment and drives quality.

Top teams understand their goals in concrete, measurable and commercially-relevant terms. Each goal includes key measurable metrics (that are available to everyone on the team), which can be used to determine team effectiveness. Understanding and working toward these common goals as a unit is crucial to the team’s success.

An effective team works collaboratively and interdependently. Collaboration and a solid sense of interdependency defuse blaming behavior and stimulate opportunities for deeper insight. Without this sense of interdependency in responsibility and reward, blaming behaviors can occur which will quickly erode team effectiveness.

Can “fixed” operating units be imbued with these qualities?  My colleagues and I are on the fence about this one.  It’s a big question and the answer is likely to be the kind of big idea that can move organizations forward.  I hope to post the results of our on-going dialogue and findings about this subject…